Follow Your Heart?
“Follow your heart!” This is the most common advice for young people contemplating their future career path. This is not good advice. At some point in my life, the most popular aspiration among my friends’ children was to become opera singers. But the world only has room for a few opera singers. All of these children ended up doing something completely unrelated.
Aspiring to be a mathematician is a much more practical dream. There are so many professions that are friendly to mathematicians: actuary, finance, economics, teaching, computer science, cryptography, and programming, to name a few. Unlike opera singers, skilled mathematicians can find a way to get paid for their mathematical gifts.
However, most of the youngsters around me want to be research mathematicians. This is a different story. My adviser, Israel Gelfand, told everyone that if they could survive without mathematics, they should drop it. I did drop mathematics for some time to care for my children, but I couldn’t live without mathematics. I fed math to my children for breakfast and pursued math hobbies that could fit a single mother’s lifestyle. Well, that means I was mostly working with sequences for the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences and building the database for my Number Gossip website. But I digress.
I agree with Gelfand. Research in math as a career choice is non-trivial. Here are some of the big issues:
- Money. An entry-level salary for MIT undergraduate alums is about twice as much as graduate students’ stipends. This discrepancy in income continues for a long time.
- Location. It is challenging to find a professorship. People looking for academic jobs are expected to send hundreds of job applications and accept a position anywhere in the country. This might be unacceptable for people who value their family and roots.
- Time. Many research mathematicians I know work 24/7. Not always by choice. Some want to secure a future tenure and need to publish papers in addition to teaching innovative courses. Some do want to do research but are too distracted with their routine and administrative tasks. As a result, their research spills out into nights and weekends.
- Gender and such. Discrimination is a separate big problem for women and minorities, which I do not want to discuss today.
So what would I suggest for young people who love math?
Many people who love math do not really love math per se. They love the way of thinking that math encourages. They love logic, generating ideas, precision, innovation, and so on. This makes their potential job search much wider. Such people might enjoy programming, cryptography, data science, actuarial science, finance, economics, computer science, engineering, etc. I know students planned to become mathematicians but tried an internship in finance and found their real passion.
For those who want to be closer to mathematics, there is always teaching: the world needs way more math teachers than research mathematicians. Plus, teaching provides a strong feeling of making an impact.
So what do I suggest for young people who love opera singing?
Many skills are less in demand than mathematics. It is important to be realistic. So here is my advice:
- Expand your skill set. If you love opera singing, working as a voice coach might be a solution.
- Explore secondary interests. If you also enjoy programming, you might find your happiness by building music software.
- Have a backup plan. You might become a lawyer to support yourself and your family and keep your love of music as a hobby, for example, by singing in a choir.
- Meet yourself halfway. You might get a half-time job to feed yourself and work on your music business for the other half of the time.
I know a former Soviet mathematician who worked as a night guard and used his quiet work time to invent theorems. He was a good mathematician but couldn’t find a research position because he was Jewish. He later immigrated to the US and found a professorship. So sometimes my advice for opera singers works for mathematicians too.
Respectfully, I think “accept a position anywhere in the country” is too generous. Perhaps that should be “accept a position anywhere in the world”?27 March 2023, 10:40 pm
David, I agree that my experiences are outdated. The situation is changing for the worse.28 March 2023, 10:06 am
Unfortunately, there is only so much mathematics to discover. Once the fundamental axioms are discovered and assembled which together generate the world of our observation, it will be all applications and- footnotes.
Frankly, I think science has been basically dogging it for the last 40 years.
How complicated can it be?
And these axioms can only be based on number theoretic relationships. There are no others to work with.
And they are at least partially ordered in terms of physical significance,
and we should expect that the relationships, the simpler relationships associated with the smaller numbers would be, phenomenologically the most dominant. The most persistent. The most stable.
Indeed, many relationships defined by the smallest numbers we might observe as some sort of integral of more refined actions, symmetric in our observations.
This sort of approach is associated with Kabbalah, the ancient Jewish system of mystic endeavor. I tell you this so you will (have pretext to) disregard and disassociate anything of any importance in the above paragraphs, And so continue on your merry way.
And as for the investigation of the inner world, your experience with mathematics may prove empowering.
And so continue on your merry way.
Arghh! Big hint.
FOUR dimensions of space time. FOUR Nicely Normed Algebras. 2 + 2 = 2 x 2 = FOUR. Conjecture: Fermat’s Last Theorem28 March 2023, 10:40 am
One of the founding texts of Kabballah, the Sefer Yetzirah, contains only the most primitive of combinatorics. (At least in the translation I read. It’s short.) So the Kabballists probably got lost along the way in their research. A few times.28 March 2023, 10:49 am