<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thue-Morse Odiousness</title>
	<link>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97</link>
	<description>Mathematics, applications of mathematics to life in general, and my life as a mathematician</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are you game? (Part II &#8211; Numbers are evil! &#8230; at least some of them are &#8230; others are odious!) &#171; Thesquaredcircle</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-7781</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you game? (Part II &#8211; Numbers are evil! &#8230; at least some of them are &#8230; others are odious!) &#171; Thesquaredcircle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-7781</guid>
		<description>[...] called this property putridity. On Tanya Khovanova&#8217;s Math blog in a blog entry called Thue-Morse Odiousness, Ingrid Daubechies suggested in a comment that the more appropriate name would be perfidy &#8211; a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] called this property putridity. On Tanya Khovanova&#8217;s Math blog in a blog entry called Thue-Morse Odiousness, Ingrid Daubechies suggested in a comment that the more appropriate name would be perfidy &#8211; a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya Khovanova</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-7677</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Khovanova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 01:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-7677</guid>
		<description>I received a letter from John Conway in reply to Ingid's suggestion of "perfidy":

 MUCH BETTER!

In fact it's better in two ways - closer still to "parity," AND a better fit with "evil" and "odious"!  Gets my vote right off.  JHC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received a letter from John Conway in reply to Ingid&#8217;s suggestion of &#8220;perfidy&#8221;:</p>
<p> MUCH BETTER!</p>
<p>In fact it&#8217;s better in two ways - closer still to &#8220;parity,&#8221; AND a better fit with &#8220;evil&#8221; and &#8220;odious&#8221;!  Gets my vote right off.  JHC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid Daubechies</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid Daubechies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>Parity of a number tells us whether it is even or odd; why not name "perfidy" the property that describes whether a number is evil or odious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parity of a number tells us whether it is even or odd; why not name &#8220;perfidy&#8221; the property that describes whether a number is evil or odious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>Grudgingly, I have to concede that John Conway's word "putridity" is indeed a word. However, I much prefer the older and more time-honored synonym which I recall as the closing word of Edgar Allan Poe's tale "The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar":

"Upon the bed, before the whole company, there lay a nearly liquid mass of loathsome——of detestable putrescence."

The distastefulness of the subject notwithstanding, don't you find "putrescence" a much more lilting word than "putridity"?

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grudgingly, I have to concede that John Conway&#8217;s word &#8220;putridity&#8221; is indeed a word. However, I much prefer the older and more time-honored synonym which I recall as the closing word of Edgar Allan Poe&#8217;s tale &#8220;The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Upon the bed, before the whole company, there lay a nearly liquid mass of loathsome——of detestable putrescence.&#8221;</p>
<p>The distastefulness of the subject notwithstanding, don&#8217;t you find &#8220;putrescence&#8221; a much more lilting word than &#8220;putridity&#8221;?</p>
<p> <img src='http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ctibor O. Zizka</title>
		<link>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-4497</link>
		<dc:creator>Ctibor O. Zizka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.tanyakhovanova.com/?p=97#comment-4497</guid>
		<description>Dear Tanya,

the "classic" Thue-Morse seq. can be expressed as a(n)=S2(n)mod 2, where S2(n) = sum of digits of n, n in base-2 notation. A year ago I was looking on the more general case :
Let Sk(n) = sum of digits of n; n in base-k notation. Let F(t) be some arithmetic function.
Then a(n)= F(Sk(n)) mod m is a generalised Thue-Morse sequence.
Nice properties have sequences where F(Sk(n))=floor(Q*Sk(n)); Q is a positive rational number.

Partial sums of a generalized Thue-Morse sequence a(n)=F(Sk(n)) mod m are fractal --&#62; they consist of series of the generalized batrachion Blancmange function (similarly to Hofstadter's Q-Sequence, Hofstadter-Conway 10000$ and Mallows seq. etc.). A good article is http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0406/0406078v1.pdf which mirrors my computational results from an ergodic/Pascal-adic transformation point of view. Partial sums of such generalized Thue-Morse seq. also points to the Minkowski Question Mark function and relates the continued-fraction representation of the real numbers to their k-ary expansion http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0810/0810.1265v2.pdf. 

I do not know if my note is of interest for you,

Have a nice day,

Ctibor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tanya,</p>
<p>the &#8220;classic&#8221; Thue-Morse seq. can be expressed as a(n)=S2(n)mod 2, where S2(n) = sum of digits of n, n in base-2 notation. A year ago I was looking on the more general case :<br />
Let Sk(n) = sum of digits of n; n in base-k notation. Let F(t) be some arithmetic function.<br />
Then a(n)= F(Sk(n)) mod m is a generalised Thue-Morse sequence.<br />
Nice properties have sequences where F(Sk(n))=floor(Q*Sk(n)); Q is a positive rational number.</p>
<p>Partial sums of a generalized Thue-Morse sequence a(n)=F(Sk(n)) mod m are fractal &#8211;&gt; they consist of series of the generalized batrachion Blancmange function (similarly to Hofstadter&#8217;s Q-Sequence, Hofstadter-Conway 10000$ and Mallows seq. etc.). A good article is <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0406/0406078v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/0406/0406078v1.pdf</a> which mirrors my computational results from an ergodic/Pascal-adic transformation point of view. Partial sums of such generalized Thue-Morse seq. also points to the Minkowski Question Mark function and relates the continued-fraction representation of the real numbers to their k-ary expansion <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0810/0810.1265v2.pdf." rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0810/0810.1265v2.pdf.</a> </p>
<p>I do not know if my note is of interest for you,</p>
<p>Have a nice day,</p>
<p>Ctibor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
